Self Eval or Supervisor Eval of Staffer?
Please evaluate this fellow on their position responsibilities
Overall, how would you rate your staffers in these areas?
4 = excellent (consistently exceeded key responsibility standards);
3 = full evidence of skill (consistently met most to all key responsibility standards);
2 = evidence of minimal skill (did not consistently meet all key responsibility standards);
1 = no evidence (rarely or did not meet key responsibility standards)
Fellow understands position responsibilities
Position responsibilities were completed on time and to a high level of quality
Fellow communicated with the necessary ASP departments consistently and in a timely manner (if applicable)
Fellow was able to problem solve and come up with solutions on their own
There are a number of responsibilities that most fellows are expected to perform (please consult the collective responsibilities for more details).
Overall, how would you rate your staffer in these areas?
4 = excellent (consistently exceeded key responsibility standards);
3 = full evidence of skill (consistently met most to all key responsibility standards);
2 = evidence of minimal skill (did not consistently meet all key responsibility standards);
1 = no evidence (rarely or did not meet key responsibility standards)
Managing construction projects
Providing volunteer service
Ensure that a spiritual environment is fostered
Actively contributing to the staff team
Actively participating in the vocational discernment aspect of the Fellowship program
Please add comments. Also please note particular areas where this fellow made great improvements or had consistent struggles.
Each fellow is expected to abide by the Interpersonal Behavior Standards of respect, genuineness, empathy, and specificity (please consult the Interpersonal Behavior Standards for more details).
Overall, how would you rate your fellow in these areas?
4 = excellent (consistently exceeded key responsibility standards);
3 = full evidence of skill (consistently met most to all key responsibility standards);
2 = evidence of minimal skill (did not consistently meet all key responsibility standards);
1 = no evidence (rarely or did not meet key responsibility standards)
Three Strengths:
Three areas of improvement:
FOR SUPERVISOR TO ANSWER ONLY. Recommendation for future hiring:
If the response is anything other than "no reservations", please explain why:
FOR REGIONAL COORDINATOR/ADMIN SUPERVISOR USE ONLY. Fellows - do not enter anything in these boxes.
Strengths:
FOR REGIONAL COORDINATOR/ADMIN SUPERVISOR USE ONLY. Fellows - do not enter anything in these boxes.
Areas of Improvement:
FOR REGIONAL COORDINATOR/ADMIN SUPERVISOR USE ONLY. Fellows - do not answer this questions.
Recommendation for future hiring:
If the response is anything other than "no reservations", please explain why:
FOR REGIONAL COORDINATOR/ADMIN SUPERVISOR USE ONLY. Fellows - do not enter anything in this box.
Additional comments:
